The ongoing developments in the Red Sea and Bab al-Mandab do not represent merely a temporary navigation crisis for Egypt; they touch upon one of the most critical dimensions of its national economic security.
The stability of the Suez Canal, regarded as one of the state’s most important strategic assets and a major source of foreign currency, is no longer dependent solely on efficient management or infrastructure development. It is also increasingly tied to the stability of the security environment in the Red Sea and its southern gateway, Bab al-Mandab.
As tensions continue and threats targeting commercial vessels escalate, the possibility of shipping companies turning to alternative routes becomes greater, threatening one of the most vital sovereign resources on which the Egyptian economy relies.
The situation becomes even more concerning because Egypt is not a party to the conflict, yet it bears a significant share of its economic consequences. Since the outbreak of the Gaza war and the subsequent Houthi attacks on ships crossing the Red Sea, traffic through the Suez Canal has declined, while its foreign currency revenues have fallen to unprecedented levels.
This comes at a time when the Egyptian economy is already facing complex internal and external challenges, making any further escalation in Bab al-Mandab, following the Strait of Hormuz crisis, a strategic concern that extends beyond military considerations to directly affect the country’s financial and monetary stability.
While the Hormuz crisis remains one of the most prominent arenas of confrontation between the United States and Iran, the Bab al-Mandab has once again moved to the forefront with the renewed Houthi threats to international navigation. It is as though the Hormuz crisis alone was not enough to unsettle the global economy, before Bab al-Mandab was added to the equation, widening the pressure on the world’s major maritime corridors.
If Hormuz represents the artery of global energy flows, Bab al-Mandab serves as the southern gateway for trade heading toward the Suez Canal and European markets. This means that international commerce is now facing pressure from two strategic fronts, with consequences extending to countries not directly involved in the conflict, particularly Egypt.
These maritime passages have become among the most significant geopolitical tools of coercion in international relations, allowing states or non-state actors to influence the global economy without engaging in a full-scale war, simply by threatening freedom of navigation and increasing levels of risk.
From this perspective, Iran’s regional behavior can be better understood. Aware of the significant power imbalance with the United States, Tehran has, over the past decades, developed a strategy based on asymmetric deterrence through a network of regional allies and proxies capable of threatening Western interests and creating economic and political pressure without resorting to direct confrontation.
In this context, Houthi actions in the Red Sea cannot be separated from this broader strategy. They represent one of the most important instruments for influencing the security of international navigation. The objective is not limited to targeting a ship or disrupting a maritime journey; it extends further by creating a continuous state of strategic uncertainty.
In today’s global economy, shipping companies do not wait for threats to materialize before acting. They respond to risks and probabilities, and even the announcement of an attack on a vessel or a threat to target navigation can push companies to reassess their exposure, increase insurance costs, and redirect ships around the Cape of Good Hope. Such alternatives bring longer travel times, higher transportation costs, and increased commodity prices.
For Egypt, the consequences are not limited to a decline in the number of vessels passing through the Suez Canal but quickly extend to financial markets and the currency exchange market. Recent developments have highlighted the Egyptian economy’s sensitivity to geopolitical tensions in the Red Sea. The dollar’s price rose in the local market following reports of attacks targeting two ships in the Red Sea, despite the incident occurring outside Egyptian waters and having no direct impact on the Suez Canal.
Markets do not react only to events themselves but also to expectations surrounding them. As concerns grow over a potential decline in Suez Canal revenues, investors and traders reassess risks related to foreign currency availability, increasing demand for the dollar as a safe-haven asset before the actual economic effects of the crisis emerge.
Consequently, Egypt’s exchange rate is no longer shaped solely by domestic economic factors or monetary policy decisions; it has become increasingly linked to security developments in the Red Sea.
This demonstrates the close connection between maritime security and economic security. Disruptions to navigation do not only affect Suez Canal revenues but also influence foreign reserves, the balance of payments, investor confidence, import costs, and inflation rates. As a result, any threat to Bab al-Mandab becomes an indirect threat to Egypt’s economic stability.
In light of this, the security of Bab al-Mandab is no longer an issue affecting only countries bordering the Red Sea; it has become part of Egypt’s national security framework. Protecting the Suez Canal does not begin at its entrances but starts with ensuring the stability of the routes leading to it, foremost among them Bab al-Mandab. Moreover, maintaining the flow of global trade through this corridor is no longer merely an economic necessity but a strategic imperative that directly affects Egypt’s ability to preserve its financial and monetary stability.
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed by the writers are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Annahar.
Thank you for subscribing to our newsletter
